Climate models falling outside acceptable scientific boundaries

It seems there is no end to the He said /She said arguments that surround the Global Warming debate, on the one side are those who say we are heading for a man made crisis and it will cost trillions to even try to find a solution and on the other side there are those who say it is Mother Natures doing what she has done since the beginning of time and it is not man made and the research daa being spouted by the media is flawed, so who do we believe ? Where do we get the true facts ? And how much is it going to cost to get those facts ? Interesting article to read and think about

Last month former vice president Al Gore made a well publicized appearance before a Senate committee warning of the dangers of global warming. Lesser known is the appearance of a climatologist before a House subcommittee two weeks later that called into question the models on which anthropogenic [manmade] global warming advocates use to base their assertions on.

http://www.examiner.com/x-219-Denver-Weather-Examiner~y2009m2d26-Climate-models-falling-outside-acceptable-scientific-boundaries

Read more...

Seems Consensus Is Waning

What is the truth, the REAL truth about global warming ? Why is it costing billions to research something that no one can agree on ? And if it is really that much of a problem, in tht it will destroy the whole planet, then why is there no joining of all the forces together, ie the scientists, the enviromentalist etc to work together to try to determine what is needed to be done, and another thing, why are the worlds leaders not pooling their funds together, what is the point of the US researching something that the UK are as well, and why are only these two countries the only ones concerned ? Is it because we are spendthrifts and love to give money to any one and everyone ?

Disinformation is something that I really despise. After looking into the manmade global warming hysteria over the last few months, I am now convinced that this is a movement based upon fabrications. The entire consensus that Al Gore and his cronies tout is totally bogus. It is time that the truth be revealed.

It appears that there will be a gathering this week of credible people who carry a viewpoint that the argument over manmade global warming is not over. These individuals believe the evidence provided to prove "man's destruction of the Earth" is not credible. I tend to follow their reasoning.


http://therevolutionagain.blogspot.com/2009/03/seems-consensus-is-waning.html

Read more...

Increased Number Think Global Warming Is “Exaggerated”

Image by uopfindsomt via Flickr

More and more are now thinking while there might be something in all the 'global warming' hype that is costing the world billions in research, it is greatly exaggerated rather than underestimated

As recently as 2006, significantly more Americans thought the news underestimated the seriousness of global warming than said it exaggerated it, 38% vs. 30%. Now, according to Gallup's 2009 Environment survey, more Americans say the problem is exaggerated rather than underestimated, 41% vs. 28%.

The trend in the "exaggerated" response has been somewhat volatile since 2001, and the previous high point, 38%, came in 2004. Over the next two years, "exaggerated" sentiment fell to 31% and 30%. Still, as noted, the current 41% is the highest since Gallup's trend on this measure began in 1997.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116590/Increased-Number-Think-Global-Warming-Exaggerated.aspx

Read more...

It seems that more and more are questioning Man Made Global Warming * a.k.a.climate change*
As more evidence, and I use that term very loosely, is being called into question surely there should now be an investigation into all the funds and money spent on research ?

Here are some questions every American should ask their elected officials – especially those supporting “climate change” legislation: If it is proven that climate change is not man-made, but natural, will you be relieved and excited to know that man is off the hook? Will you now help to remove all of the draconian regulations passed during the global warming hysteria, since it was all wrong headed and harmful to the economy and our way of life?

Their answers to these questions should be very illuminating as to the true agenda they seek to impose. Is their agenda really about helping to protect the environment, or is it about creating a new social and economic order, using the environment as the excuse?

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/

Read more...